On Tuesday, Central Bancompany (NASDAQ:CBC) discussed first-quarter financial results during its earnings call. The full transcript is provided below.

This content is powered by Benzinga APIs. For comprehensive financial data and transcripts, visit https://www.benzinga.com/apis/.

Access the full call at https://edge.media-server.com/mmc/p/jwuqmnmy/

Summary

Central Bancompany Inc reported a net income of $111.1 million for Q1 2026, representing a 17% increase from the previous year, with a return on average assets of 2.2% and a net interest margin (NIM) of 4.36%.

The company announced a meaningful increase to their quarterly dividend and repurchased $32 million worth of shares, leveraging attractive prices and expanded liquidity.

Future outlook remains positive with expectations for continued loan growth, stable asset quality, and strategic capital deployment, although no imminent acquisition plans were disclosed.

Deposit growth is targeted through acquisition campaigns focusing on primary checking accounts, while excess liquidity is being managed through strategic investments in government-backed securities.

Management emphasized their strong capital position and intention to improve stock valuation to support potential future mergers and acquisitions, reflecting confidence in their strategic direction.

Full Transcript

OPERATOR

Good day and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Central Bancompany Inc first quarter 2026 earnings conference call. At this time all participants are in a listen only mode. After the speaker's presentation there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during the session, you'll need to press star 11 on your telephone. You will then hear an automated message advising your hand is raised to ask your question, please press Star one again. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your speaker for today, John Ross, President and CEO. Please go ahead.

John Ross (President and CEO)

Thank you Operator Good morning and thank you for joining us for Central Bancompany Inc's first quarter 2026 earnings call. With me in the room today are our Chief Financial Officer Jim Ciroli, Chief Customer Officer Dan Westhughes and Chief Credit Officer Eric Holgren. As a reminder, I'd like to point out that the discussion today is subject to the same forward looking considerations outlined on page three of our press release. Today we plan to briefly discuss first quarter highlights before opening the line for questions. Before I turn to the numbers, please allow me to share some non financial highlights. In the first quarter we were humbled to again be named one of America's best banks by Forbes as well as the best performing US public bank with more than 10 billion in assets by S&P Global Market Intelligence. Recognition from such organizations is a testament to the efforts of our nearly 3,000 full time employees who I'd like to thank for their continued legendary service. With that, let's cover the financial results for the quarter. Central bank posted net income of $111.1 million or $0.46 per fully diluted share, return on average assets of 2.2%, NIM on an FTE basis of 4.36% and an efficiency ratio on an FTE basis of 45.7%. Relative to the first quarter of 2025, net income increased $16.3 million or 17%. Our asset quality remained consistent with 10 basis points of net charge offs again this quarter and allowance covered 130 basis points of total loans. We remain encouraged by the continued resumption of growth in our balance sheet with ending loans excluding other consumer of nearly 6% annualized quarter over quarter and average deposits of 5% year over year. Lastly, capital levels at the holding company remain well above target with approximately 1.9 billion of excess or $7.80 per share. We leaned into capital deployment this quarter by announcing a meaningful increase to our quarterly dividend and repurchasing $32 million worth of our shares, taking advantage of attractive prices and expanded liquidity. We are pleased with these results and appreciate those on the line for joining us for this call. With that, I'd like to open the line for questions.

OPERATOR

Operator. As a reminder, if you have a question, please press star 11 on your telephone. You'll hear that automated message advice when your hand is raised to remove yourself, please press star 11 again. One moment while we compile the Q and A roster. And our first question is coming from the line of Manning Gosalia of Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.

Manning Gosalia (Equity Analyst)

Hi, good morning all. Good morning. Line. So it looks like loan yields held up nicely despite rate cuts at the end of last year. I was hoping you can help us with what's going on under the surface in terms of yield spreads, fixed rate, loan repos, pricing, et cetera. Anything that can help us think through the forward look under different rate scenarios given that rate expectations have been moving around quite significantly over the past several weeks.

Jim Ciroli (Chief Financial Officer)

Yeah, happy to. Manning, this is Jim. So looking at it on a linked quarter basis, as you look at the loan yields, yeah sure, they came down three basis points. Almost all of that was loan fees just coming off of higher prepayment fees in the prior quarter, which being that we had fewer prepayments this quarter. And I would also note that our loans kind of ended the quarter higher than their average. So we're showing kind of growth momentum coming out of the quarter and into the second quarter. So with fewer prepayments, we kind of like that scenario. What I would say additionally is that we repriced about 400 million in the quarter and we anticipate about a billion eight more for the rest of the year. Repricing. When those loans are repricing, they're coming out at like a 580-ish type yield and we continue to see loan opportunities at 300 basis points over over similar maturity treasuries. So as those as that billion eight reprices in the rest of the year, I think that could provide some upside to where we were in nim. One of the things I would just point out, as you look at our NIM coming down, I wouldn't necessarily focus on the loan yields coming down. They came down three basis points. But if you look at the deposit side, our deposit costs came down 5 basis points. If you factor out the shift higher in public funds that we kind of signaled on the last call. So public funds ended the fourth quarter higher and we talked about the seasonality there and Said seasonality would kind of go sideways during the quarter. That is, because the averages for the first quarter were going to be higher than the averages for the second quarter, fourth quarter, the linked quarter in public funds. And that's exactly what we saw. And we anticipate that the public funds, you saw those, I Point out, Slide 9 that we added to the deck. But you saw our public fund deposits at the end of the quarter start to come down. So the ending balance was lower than the average balance. And that's exactly what we said on the call last time. Did I cover everything you wanted, Manning?

Manning Gosalia (Equity Analyst)

That was a lot. Yeah, that was great detail. I really appreciate that. Maybe to just pivot over to the credit side. I see the credit remained broadly solid in the quarter. I guess if I really had to nitpick. One question is on the delinquencies. We've had a couple of quarters where they've edged up a little bit, and it looks like it was driven by commercial. So any thoughts you can give there on what you're seeing and your views on credit overall?

Eric Hallgren

I'll turn to Eric Hallgren, our chief credit officer, in a second. What I tell you, what I'm seeing right now is that we still continue to have a lot of small numbers in our asset quality statistics. And so when you have small numbers, small changes can seem like they're bigger than they actually are. So I think that, you know, really what we're looking at in our asset quality numbers continues to be pristine. And just like I said, small changes in that pristineness can lead to big percentage changes. But that doesn't necessarily mean anything. Eric, what color can you add? Yeah, thanks, Jeff. So the increased Manon, as you noted, was primarily driven in the first quarter by commercial. That was really concentrated to a small number of markets and largely attributable to a handful of commercial clients. From what we see, we don't anticipate those delinquencies degrading any further and expect resolution here. So overall, we view it as isolated pockets of stress and not indication of systemic. Systemic weakness kind of emerging as we look ahead for the rest of the year.

Manning Gosalia (Equity Analyst)

Got it. That's great. Thanks so much for the color.

OPERATOR

Thank you. One moment for the next question, please. And our next question will be coming from the line of Nathan Reese of Piper Sandler. Your line is open.

Nathan Reese (Equity Analyst)

Hey, guys. Good morning. Hope you're all doing well. And thanks for taking the questions. Jim. Just going back to your earlier comments around some of the deposit flows in the quarter. You know, just Curious how you're thinking about, you know, working down some of the excess liquidity that kind of weighed on the margin in 1Q and just generally how we should think about the size of the balance sheet specifically kind of earning assets as a better jump off point for the second quarter.

Jim Ciroli (Chief Financial Officer)

That's a great question, Nate. I appreciate it because we really worked hard in the first quarter. If you recall the path of rates, it wasn't terribly looking good in earlier parts of the quarter, but at the end of the quarter where we like to extend duration to is about the four year mark with our security portfolio. And near the end of the quarter we saw rates come up in that part of the curve. And so we stepped up the pace of our buying activity in March and that continued into April as well. In fact, in April we're seeing, we're reinvesting that the cash into about a 4.30% yield right now. So we continue to work hard to try to find great opportunities. You know, like we want to find things that are US Government guaranteed or at least sponsored by agencies of the US Government. We don't like taking on a lot of convexity risk and trying to deploy that money is a lot of work by our treasury team. And so when the market comes back in where we want it to be, like it did in March and April, we were able to move even more and faster in that environment than we did.

Nathan Reese (Equity Analyst)

Gotcha. That's helpful. Maybe changing gears a little bit. You know, you guys obviously continue to build excess capital. Really strong clips going forward as evidenced here in OneQ as well. So Jim, would, I'm sorry JR would love to get your kind of thoughts on just kind of your optimism level for an acquisition announcement this year and just generally how conversations are trending. Seems like you guys have a competitive currency to share with potential partners, but would just love some updated thoughts on that front.

JR

Yeah, it's a very understandable question. More than half our capital is excess and it is a major focus of ours on a daily basis. Having said all of that, we have no real updates for you at this stage. You can kind of push replay on the comments we made last quarter and just summarizing those briefly, we do think we're well positioned. We are inactive discussions, nothing is imminent. We see everything that's out there and we'll update you when we have a deal. But until then we're just going to work really hard on it. So no real updates this quarter for you.

Nathan Reese (Equity Analyst)

Okay, fair enough. Helpful. Maybe one last one for me. You know, the Payments revenue, you know, tends to show kind of a seasonally decline in the first quarter. You know, just curious if you guys still feel like some of the initiatives you put in place, particularly with Dan and his team, you know, are bearing fruit. And do you still think, you know, some of the payments revenue projections that we've talked about in the past, you know, kind of hold true in terms of kind of the. A nice ramp over the balance of this year?

JR

We do. I mean, yeah, I appreciate. Nate, do you notice the seasonality between Q4 and Q1 really comes off of the quarter in Q4 and it comes down pretty sharply. But you know, when you, when you look at this on a year over year basis, what we're seeing is still the consumers still spending. So there's no concern from a consumer spending perspective. And we're seeing nice growth on the commercial side with some of the programs we're putting into place. So I would say yeah, we continue to feel pretty sanguine about that business as we look forward.

Nathan Reese (Equity Analyst)

Okay, great. I appreciate all the color. Thanks guys.

OPERATOR

Thank you. Thank you. One moment for the next question, please. And our next question will be coming from the line of Matt only of Stevens. Your line is open.

Matt Only

Hey, thanks. Good morning everybody. Just want to go back to the deposit discussion. And Jim, you already addressed the moving parts around the public funds and slide 9 is helpful for that. Any general observations you can share as far as just the competitive dynamics for deposits in your marketplace and kind of what you're seeing more recently? That's a fair question, Matt. And welcome to, welcome to coverage on our stock. So looking forward to spending more time with you as well. What you're going to find as you look at us is we're out there generally growing deposits at around, you know, adjusting for seasonality, which we have a lot this quarter. Adjusting for seasonality, we're growing deposits kind of mid single digits across our markets. But we're doing that through our acquisition campaigns where we're focused on growing checking accounts. So we're focused really on being our borrowers or I'm sorry, our depositors primary checking account. We're focused on primacy overall. And I think this quarter, once you normalize the activity, you can see the growth that I'm talking about in terms of mid single digits. So we're not really out there competing for the yield seeking funds. We're out there competing on service, trying to be people's primary checking account in the markets that we serve. So I don't think we would be the best to Ask the competitive questions. I think it is competitive out there from what I hear, but that's not really the market we compete in. Okay. Appreciate the color on that. And then I guess going back to the capital discussion, I think you noted in prepared remarks you stepped up the share repurchase program this quarter, just over a million shares. I guess help us appreciate your capital allocation strategy and where buybacks come into play. And I think JR Already addressed m and a question, so just put that aside for a second. I'm trying to appreciate the. I think you disclosed that ROIC around 12% based off kind of the way you guys think about it. Any more color you can share on capital allocation and the buybacks?

Jim Ciroli (Chief Financial Officer)

Yeah. So one of the things I would point out is that Even with the 32 million that we bought back this quarter and we stepped up the dividend, we still continued to grow our excess capital number. So it went from a billion eight to a billion nine. As JR said, more than half of our tangible book value is excess capital. And when we look at that excess capital and we look at. We value that at roughly a dollar for dollar. I don't know how else you'd value that. And you strip out, you look at what our core capital is and compare that to any measure you want. Trailing 12 months, next 12 months of expectation. Looking at 20, 27 earnings, we think the stock is still cheap. And if we intend to use that stock in a MA transaction, having it that cheap is something that we'd like to work against. We'd like to get that stock a little bit more value to the marketplace. Jerry, anything you want to add to that? No, I mean, to your point on roic, we do calculate it. We calculate it in the same way that we look at other bank acquisitions, because we think that's a good practice. And we look at several other methods as well. But practically speaking, it's the intuition of single digit P E multiple on a forward basis, when you look at the core bank is very attractive. Now, obviously, $32 million is a drop in the bucket compared to our excess capital. The one last thing I would add that we were pleasantly surprised was the increase in the liquidity in the stock, which will maybe provide us more opportunities on that front as we go forward here as well. We were a little bit constrained in our initial, you know, resolution of the 50 million because we were concerned about impacting the liquidity of the stock. But we've been pleasantly surprised to see a pickup here.

OPERATOR

Okay, that's perfect, guys. Thanks for the color. Thank You. Thanks Matt. Thank you. One moment for the next question. And our next question will be coming from the line of Christopher McGadry of KBW. Your line is open.

Christopher McGadry (Equity Analyst)

Great morning Jim. On expenses, really good performance in the quarter. Can you speak to sustainability and maybe broader operating leverage expectations? Thanks. Yeah, great question. Look, I think what you saw on a quarter over quarter basis, has that come down a little bit. What I would share with you on the current quarter, you know we've signaled that we're going to have some additional costs of around 5 million a year in terms of public company expenses. When we look at it, the first quarter has about that, you know, run rate in it. So the other thing I would share is that, you know, we are still in the middle of our core conversion but during the quarter we only capitalized 700,000 of the, of the dollars that we spent. So I think the first quarter NIE is fairly loaded. I think that's fairly sustainable run rate. There might be a little uptick because we do merit increases in March, but there's, there's not going to be much of an uptick that I would expect. Okay, it's, that's helpful. And if I could go to slide 5, the updated rate sensitivity static analysis, I think it was up a touch, call it 100 basis points from last quarter. But the base case shows a pretty good ramp in both years. Can you speak to just broader any strategies being contemplated to you know, lock in the margins given higher for longer is seemingly a base case. How we should be thinking about progression of NII as you get a little bit better growth in the loan fee adjustment that you talked about. Chris, I appreciate the question. I really go back to what I was talking with Nate about and answering Nate's question. You know, I think that, you know, one of our biggest opportunities is to continue to invest our excess cash. And because most of the quarter the differential between the four year point on the curve and the overnight point on the curve was slight. That's kind of steepened a little bit with an anticipation that we won't have a rate cut until sometime late in 27. And as that environment has improved, we've accelerated our investing strategy, put that excess cash to work. But also having said that, I think the real opportunities come from continuing to grow non interest bearing deposits. I think there's still some movement to do on the deposit cost side and managing those down. I'd point out that 90% of our deposit base is non maturity. And so in order to work that down from the rate cuts we saw in late 25 our market CEOs have to go out there every day and try to manually work that count with their depositors. So it's not something that just mechanically comes down. We still think a low 20s beta is appropriate but because of that nature of the non maturity deposits that's going to take a little while to come in. And then I point out the seasonality too as we roll out of first quarter with the higher public fund deposits. And that's why we put slide nine in there Chris, to help you, help give you transparency on that phenomenon and the seasonality. So as that comes down, like I said earlier, had we not mixed higher in public fund deposits, our cost of deposits would have been down 5 basis points on a linked quarter basis. And so as we see those pub fund deposits come down across Q2 and Q3, I expect that the mixing lower in those deposits will continue to benefit net interest margin as well. Okay, just if I could squeeze one on the excess cash, how does that settle in terms of proportional balance sheet

Jim Ciroli (Chief Financial Officer)

over the next couple years? Where do you want to run cash to earning assets? I don't think of it as much that way as I think about so it's not necessarily percentage. Thank you.

Disclaimer: This transcript is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, there may be errors or omissions in this automated transcription. For official company statements and financial information, please refer to the company's SEC filings and official press releases. Corporate participants' and analysts' statements reflect their views as of the date of this call and are subject to change without notice.